There is already a 9vx is already included in tiny core, so that was not much to play with :)
I also think that the usage cases of tinycore/9vx and a plan9port-based "normal" distro are different, but I might be wrong. As I said at first, though. The whole thing is mostly for fun. It seems like a system can run quite OK even when the plan9port bin directory is first in the PATH... At the moment I am basically just trying to figure out how to make the plan9port parts more deeply embedded into the system and how to best leverage plan9port stuff as defaults. in response to a previous question: yes it is 10.04 and I have absolutely no idea how the plymoth works, which probably is one of my problems... One reason I looked at debian-based systems at first was that they allegedly had gotten rid of Bash-isms in their init scripts (in contrast to Arch), but since the ISO refused to boot after I removed Bash, I am sort of sceptical about that... Personally, I definitely look forward to playing with Sta.li whenever it is ready. A really cool project! 2010/7/30 hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>: > I think this is a very nice distribution: tinycorelinux.com > It uses busybox and sh scripts for it's base and definitely has no > bash dependency. > There's only one bad thing that comes to my mind: it has no man pages > by default. > >
