On 10/08/2010, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > The wiki/bugtracker integration is key to it's design principles. The > repository is a complete collection of source files, documentation (wiki) > and tickets (bugtracker). This means that as repositories are cloned, > the new repository has a very complete view of the project, moreso than > if tickets are stored in some third-party application.
I wonder whether this could be done another way. An hg repo could hold all the source, documentation, and tickets; werc could produce the web views for the docs and bugs; and a tracker could automatically push recieved tickets. I don't know, it might not be as enjoyable to use. I just naturally dislike fossil's monolithic solution. cls
