Hey, On 19 October 2010 20:15, Kurt H Maier <karmaf...@gmail.com> wrote: > Each distribution should have their own discussion about this on their > own lists, so we don't have to listen to to it. dwm is licensed such > that we don't have to give a damn how they patch the software.
I think knowing how the suckless tools are being distributed is useful for certain people on this list. For example I'd like to be told if dmenu's packaging changes significantly without having to subscribe to the mailing list for every major distribution. There's always the mantra "don't care, don't read". cls
