On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Kurt H Maier <karmaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Kris Maglione <maglion...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> it wasn't a leak.
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Kris Maglione <maglion...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> the free list grew without bound
>
> what
>
>
> --
> # Kurt H Maier
>
>

Leaked memory is allocated but unreachable, the result of failing to
free a dead block. In this case, the fault was increasing the size of
a memory pool without the pool manager's knowledge. It happened to
result in the same failure that a memory leak would cause, but the two
fault types are still distinct.

--
Steve McKay

Reply via email to