On 1 Apr 2011, at 3:07 pm, Stefan Mark wrote:
On 01.04.2011 16:01, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On 1 Apr 2011, at 2:56 pm, Stefan Mark wrote:
On 01.04.2011 15:50, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On 1 Apr 2011, at 2:06 pm, pancake wrote:
You may see some other differences... and the missuse of bright
when
bold
sometimes hurts my eyes... but some programs just are hard to read
without
it...
Why does no-one ever seem to consider just not using programs
which are
broken this badly, or at least filing serious bug reports on
them? It's
They are not broken. As far as i understand it, both ways are
correct.
Early terminals did not have bold fonts, so bold text was done using
higher brightness (which actually looked bold on these Eye burning
machines).
If "eye burning" is not broken, what is? That's my point.
Some people like it, some dont. It fits the standard (i think, seems a
bit complicated).
Some people like it so applications are made which hurt other
people's eyes and then you find there's no good alternative to these
apps... The only answers I can see are limitation and configuration,
but the latter of course tends to suck and the former reeks of
rigourous standards. Perhaps we need a suckless htop, *lol*.
