On 3 Apr 2011, at 1:37 pm, Džen wrote:
I don't know what you guys think, but why not simply return messages which contain a text/html attachment to the sender? Maybe like this people might learn it someday and trash such shitty MUAs...
I think some mailing lists do this. Some simply drop all attachments but means you can't attach patches. Of course, the ML could just drop text/html attachments. The big problem is not attachments but mail which does not have a plain-text component.
You know, we could all say we're using shitty MUAs because we see the rendered HTML rather than the plain-text component. ;) Even HTML-only mail can be converted to plain text.
/me mumbles something about "suckless" and "MUA" :D
