On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:27:26PM +0200, pancake wrote: > On 05/04/11 16:31, Nick wrote: > i dont see the point of using libglade for the gtk backend... it's > just the reason why it depends on libxml and this is probably the > main bottleneck for loading the gtk UI... > >I think their RISC OS frontend is the most mature, though; > >the underlying html rendering code is nicer than the linux > >GUI code. > > > i dont really care about riscos.. and gtk is not *linux gui* . gtk > runs on osx, w32 and others. not only X11 backends.
By 'linux gui' I only meant gui that works on Linux. > >>I don't get the point of not distributing netsurf as a library... it > >>would be great if this project was just producing a standalone > >>library and a simple client implementation. > >netsurf is basically a client implementation of a few > >different libraries; see > >http://www.netsurf-browser.org/projects/ A simple client > >based on some of these should be do-able. > > > uhm... i see.. but the rendering part is found inside netsurf.. not > in a separated library.. Good point, sorry, my brain is slow today.
