Bogdan Ionuț a écrit : > > > I can bet that it's uselessgap patch related. > > Indeed. > > Is there a rock solid version of that patch floating around? > Try the patch attached.
In fact, I'm using this vesion.
To fix the aforementioned problem I had to change this line:
unsigned int gap = c->isfloating ? 0 : c->mon->lt[c->mon->sellt]->addgaps ?
gappx : 0;
to:
unsigned int gap = (c->isfloating ||
!c->mon->lt[c->mon->sellt]->arrange) ? 0 : c->mon->lt[c->mon->sellt]->addgaps ?
gappx : 0;
