Hi, On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29 September 2011 20:08, Jeremy Jackins <[email protected]> wrote: >> hg clone http://hg.suckless.org/sandy >> gives >> abort: HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error
Also, if I do: $ hg -v pull running ssh [email protected] "hg -R /repos/sandy serve --stdio" remote: abort: There is no Mercurial repository here (.hg not found)! abort: no suitable response from remote hg! yet .hg seems to be there: $ ssh [email protected] ls -A /repos/sandy config.def.h config.mk .hg .hgtags LICENSE Makefile README sandy.1 sandy.c TODO however... $ ssh [email protected] hg -R /repos/sandy -v status abort: requirement 'dotencode' not supported! Looking at hg docs at http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/RequiresFile#Older_Mercurial_versions it seems like the new suckless host has an old mercurial version: $ hg --version Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 1.9.2) (see http://mercurial.selenic.com for more information) Copyright (C) 2005-2011 Matt Mackall and others This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. $ ssh [email protected] hg --version Mercurial Distributed SCM (version 1.6.4) Copyright (C) 2005-2010 Matt Mackall <[email protected]> and others This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Is there any reason for this? Should I do the "hg --config format.dotencode=0" trick that the hg docs suggest and push it? It seems fair since other repos don't seem to need dotencode. Cheers, Rafa.
