Greetings. Connor Lane Smith wrote: > On 30/10/2011, Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Apart from this, the boundary of 2kSLOC was chosen kind of randomly. I >> personally feel that an average mind like myself can grasp 2k SLOC >> easily and that this is a good strategy to keep the code readable and >> maintainable. > > That reminds me: I think we need more comments. Although I have a fair > grasp of how dwm works, there are a few aspects which remain confusing > to me. Based on people's very positive reactions to my adding a bunch > of comments to dmenu recently, I think it would be a great idea to add > some to dwm, just explaining "what is going on"... > > Documentation in general is where the suckless project is somewhat > lacking. It would be nice if we could make a group effort to write a > big chunk of documentation on how to use dwm and dmenu, maintaining > patch queues, and so on. We have a few pages on the site wiki, but > docs are *very* thin on the ground. And as a bonus we'd probably get > fewer people on IRC repeatedly asking the same questions.
Just do it. You're just complaining. »Group efforts« is GNU tyranny. I want to propose an ISO 9001:2008 certified quality management for all our sourcecode. In a simple group effort we will be able to grasp this in no time. Are you sure you're not some Gnome spy? Sincerely, Christoph Lohmann
