> I attached a somewhat ugly patch to correct the behavior, [...]
Since I didn't like how this patch turned out I looked into this a bit
further. Attached is a less intrusive patch, once to tip and once to
6.0. I ran this patch for a day or so and didn't have any issues.
If no problems show up I think this is a better way of dealing with the
SDL problem.
--
Eckehard Berns
diff -r 070112b7435f dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Thu Jan 12 07:36:05 2012 +0100
+++ b/dwm.c Sat Jan 14 12:34:59 2012 +0100
@@ -397,9 +397,10 @@
showhide(m->stack);
else for(m = mons; m; m = m->next)
showhide(m->stack);
- if(m)
+ if(m) {
arrangemon(m);
- else for(m = mons; m; m = m->next)
+ restack(m);
+ } else for(m = mons; m; m = m->next)
arrangemon(m);
}
@@ -408,7 +409,6 @@
strncpy(m->ltsymbol, m->lt[m->sellt]->symbol, sizeof m->ltsymbol);
if(m->lt[m->sellt]->arrange)
m->lt[m->sellt]->arrange(m);
- restack(m);
}
void
@@ -1420,6 +1420,8 @@
drawbar(m);
if(!m->sel)
return;
+ if(m->sel->isfloating || !m->lt[m->sellt]->arrange)
+ XRaiseWindow(dpy, m->sel->win);
if(m->lt[m->sellt]->arrange) {
wc.stack_mode = Below;
wc.sibling = m->barwin;
diff -r ec4baab78314 dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Mon Dec 19 15:38:30 2011 +0100
+++ b/dwm.c Sat Jan 14 12:35:50 2012 +0100
@@ -397,9 +397,10 @@
showhide(m->stack);
else for(m = mons; m; m = m->next)
showhide(m->stack);
- if(m)
+ if(m) {
arrangemon(m);
- else for(m = mons; m; m = m->next)
+ restack(m);
+ } else for(m = mons; m; m = m->next)
arrangemon(m);
}
@@ -408,7 +409,6 @@
strncpy(m->ltsymbol, m->lt[m->sellt]->symbol, sizeof m->ltsymbol);
if(m->lt[m->sellt]->arrange)
m->lt[m->sellt]->arrange(m);
- restack(m);
}
void
@@ -1827,6 +1827,8 @@
.event_mask = ButtonPressMask|ExposureMask
};
for(m = mons; m; m = m->next) {
+ if (m->barwin)
+ continue;
m->barwin = XCreateWindow(dpy, root, m->wx, m->by, m->ww, bh,
0, DefaultDepth(dpy, screen),
CopyFromParent, DefaultVisual(dpy,
screen),
CWOverrideRedirect|CWBackPixmap|CWEventMask, &wa);