Obviousness varies by experience and research. On 2012-08-10 2:27 PM, "Anselm R Garbe" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10 August 2012 16:32, Ciprian Dorin Craciun > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:06 PM, hiro <[email protected]> wrote: > >> people like inventing words. so what? > > > > I'm not against inventing words... On the contrary a language must > evolve... > > > > > > But I'm against using a quasi meaningless word as an answer > > without also providing a meaningful or coherent argument sustaining > > it. Thus just to keep in the context of "suckless", if someone says: > > >> Project blah is not "suckless". > > I just ignore that statement on the basis of trolling... > > > > But if on the contrary he says: > > >> Project blah is not "suckless" because << insert at least an > > intent to explain why >>. > > > > Then I agree to the usage of the word, and I don't count it as > dogmatism. > > If something is obvious there is no need for a "because". > > -Anselm > >
