On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:19:41AM -0400, Galos, David wrote: > > OpenBSD defines strlcpy function, and the declaration is a bit different > > of the static declartion found in tar.c. The duplication of symbol name > > with different type (one extern and other static, one returning int and > > the other returning size_t) caused tar couldn't compile in OpenBSD. > > Since nothing else in sbase makes use of strlcpy I don't think that it's > worth librarizing like this. I did it for consistency in `archive`, as I > populated the Header. It might be better for now to just call it strlmov, > or define a macro STRLCPY.
If we are going to use only in this file then maybe is better use the snprintf directly. -- Roberto E. Vargas Caballero ---------------------------- k...@shike2.com http://www.shike2.com