On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:05:30PM +0300, sin wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:26:12PM +0300, FRIGN wrote: > > Am 8/29/13 9:15 PM, schrieb Anselm R Garbe: > > >On 29 August 2013 16:37, FRIGN <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>Am 8/29/13 4:58 PM, schrieb Andrew Mikhnevich: > > >> > > >>>I'm intresting in stali so. > > >>>In the conference(http://suckless.org/conference) was the performance of > > >>>this. > > >>>Presentation here http://suckless.org/slcon13.pdf > > >>> > > >>>But no http://git.sta.li/ or is it still private. > > >>> > > >>>On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:27 PM, FRIGN <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>Hello, > > >>>> > > >>>>as a follower of the suckless-projects, I was wondering how stali is > > >>>>progressing. > > >>>>There hasn't been news for almost three years now and I hope the project > > >>>>hasn't been put on ice. > > >>>> > > >>>>What is the current status? > > >>>> > > >>>> FRIGN > > >> > > >>Thanks for pointing to the pdf-file, Andrew. I seem to have missed it > > >>while > > >>going through the slcon-page. > > >>Reading the slides however, I still wonder what happened to > > >>http://git.sta.li announced to be launched that night. > > > > > >Sorry, the cgit contained an error. This is fixed now. > > > > > >Best regards, > > >Anselm > > > > > > > > > > Alright, thanks for taking care of this! > > > > A little note concerning sta.li: If we're planning to use runit as > > an init-system, it would be nice to have it hosted on git.sta.li. > > The core-software hasn't been committed to in four years and is in > > bad need for a restructure. > > > > Also, it surely would be great if we had the proposed > > stali-init-scripts by Christoph Lohmann available at this central > > location. > > > > These are just some raw ideas, but I'm sure development will kick > > off very well once there's some _transparent_ activity. > > > > What do you all think? > > I also hope that sbase and ubase can be part of sta.li instead of > busybox. > There is however, a lot of work involved to make this work nicely. > The stali-init-scripts use nldev + mdev, I'd also like to replace > mdev with smdev[1]. > I think sta.li development is currently very much decentralized.
[1] http://git.2f30.org/smdev/ Very much unfinished at the moment.
