Am 8/31/13 12:04 PM, schrieb Martti Kühne:
So, it's obviously easier to push a patch into suckless because
they're the smaller projects, and the code is still easier to read.
That way they won't stay either small nor suckless.
So, should this go into the X documentation (if there is any with
regard to window management) that it is recommended for window
managers to do this - or should I beat the lxdm guys into writing the
opposing patch?
cheers!
mar77i
As it works normally for most other people, who call dwm via startx, it
is in my opinion the lxdm-developers' job to make sure their
implementation works comparably with the given usual way of invoking a
display manager of any kind via startx.
Given the problem we have here, it is one of those cases and you should
contact them.
Cheers
FRIGN
