Alexander S. wrote: > If we want to retain this patch, I'd suggest reversing array after > sorting, not multiplying by `sortorder' in comparison functions. This > avoids code duplication.
Good suggestion. I will implement it tonight. --Markus
Alexander S. wrote: > If we want to retain this patch, I'd suggest reversing array after > sorting, not multiplying by `sortorder' in comparison functions. This > avoids code duplication.
Good suggestion. I will implement it tonight. --Markus