Nick wrote: > I was reading the opengroup specifications for make(1) recently[0], > and found that even our standard makefile practise of using 'include' > for config variables is nonstandard, as far as they're concerned. > Needless to say I think 'include' is a perfectly reasonable feature > to use, and it evidently works everywhere that people care about.
Heyho, Regarding the include config.mk used in various suckless projects: What is the benefit? If a user needs to adapt it to his system, he effectively has to edit a file. Would there be a problem if this file would be the Makefile instead of the config.mk file? Regards, Markus
