Thanks for bringing up that very important issue, I was annoyed too. Here is something else that bugs me a lot: PLEASE SPELL DWM HOW IT OUGHT BE DONE: IN CAPITALS.
I suggest other suckless projects to do so either. And I would go so far to capitalize the executables, too. Though, that might be too radical. I'd like to hear how people feel about it. Look at that: /usr/bin/ST /usr/bin/SSELP /usr/bin/SURF /usr/bin/DWM Don't they look much more appealing to you. Admit it! It's only habit if you are not immediately euphoric about this idea! Think positive, be creative, innovate, top post! * Raphaël Proust 2014-04-02 12:16 > Can you please include the whole message you are replying to in your > answers guys? It's very difficult to follow this thread if I have to > go back and read the previous messages and it is a very important > thread for the suckless group. Making good software is nice but don't > forget to make good communications too. > > By the way, can the person in charge of > https://www.facebook.com/pages/dwm/103482239693985 be a bit more > active? I keep telling people to try dwm (which needs to be rewritten > in ruby) but once they see the facebook page they say it looks dead > and bad. > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:51 AM, FRIGN <d...@frign.de> wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:11:34 +0200 > > Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: > > > >> This is great news. Now that suckless has reached the future we will see > >> a bright horizont of pleasure and commercial support. > > > > Most definitely! > > However, we need to build up your corporate identity. I suggest we make > > suckless a registered trademark and sue everyone who adopts our brand > > without permission. > > > > Cheers > > > > FRIGN > > > > -- > > FRIGN <d...@frign.de> > > > --s_
