Greetings. On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:49:20 +0200 Yuri Karaban <suckl...@dev97.com> wrote: > >>>>> "REVC" == Roberto E Vargas Caballero <k...@shike2.com> writes: > > >> if default color is used (with light background and black > >> foreground it's looking rather ugly, brightened black font > >> becomes gray and unreadable on light gray background). > > REVC>> If you don't like you can always change the background. > > Quite the opposite, I like my background color and I don't want to > change it. > > Bold colors are brightened to stand out even more. But with the light > background and dark foreground brightening acts contrary making the > letters less emphasized. > > >> Please consider adopting standard behavior, otherwise it's making > >> the bold text hard to read on a gray background ;-) > > REVC>> standard? could you explain what standard are you talking?, > REVC>> because I think no iso, or ansi, or whenever you want made a > REVC>> standard about it. > > Don't jeer, believe you understood that I mean de-facto standards > (xterm, rxvt, gnome terminals based on libvte, etc.). Every terminal > which I tried behaves consistently (doesn't brighten implicit default > foreground with bold face). You may try yourself escape sequences which > I provided. > > I'm sorry for disturbing you, I thought my observation would be > useful. I was wrong.
You give up too easily. Sincerely, Christoph Lohmann
