On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:27:52PM -0700, Ryan O’Hara wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:01 PM, FRIGN <d...@frign.de> wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:47:27 +0200 > > "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" <k...@shike2.com> wrote: > > > >> I agree with you and I like the patch. If nobody have problems with > >> it I will apply it. > > > > Cool! :) > > > > Yeah, it's the first step on refactoring the main loop. I see some > > potential. > > A problem seems to have appeared! This patch creates an st that is > unusably slow for me. Using the coarse clock doesn’t seem to help > either. Is anyone else experiencing the same behaviour? It’s > definitely 738f555f→5edeec1b, and judging by the processor time, it’s > an issue of inefficiency rather than, say, sleeping for too long.
Yeah, this was also reported on IRC, I just posted a patch to fix it. -- Ivan "Colona" Delalande
