On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:04:17 +0200 (CEST) "Köhring, Norman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I thought we already skipped the intermediate bytes? Is there any worth having > them? No. I assumed we also already ditched the ASCII-approach and went for binary-16 or 32-bit-BE-integers > Also, regarding the magic number: Image is a very common description. We > could also think about words like “picture” (or “pic”) or use some > abbreviation > of “simple image format”: SIF or SIMG? SIF is already used by Microshaft Wangblows for Setup Installation Files. SIMG is already used for Synclavier disk image files. I don't pretend to care, but come on: We can do better than that! > The format could look like MAGIC FORMAT WIDTH HEIGHT DATA. That results in for > example: > SIMGRGBA0000160000000900[data] Read above. This could be way simpler... Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <[email protected]>
