On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 12:04:12PM -0500, Steven Degutis wrote: > [...] > in the same process, which the current architecture of the program > does not allow. Otherwise the application would be limited to only > ever having one terminal emulator open, which seems to me like a > severe limitation.
This is OS X specific and weird in my opinion, if you want multiple windows lauch multiple processes. It is safer, you can limit the impact of a crash to a single window. It is also memory efficient thanks to (haters gonna hate) dynamic link. > So, had these changes been made before I started my > port, it would have saved me a day of working on it. But you're right, > now that I've already done it, there's really no point in contributing > it back to the original codebase. I sense an offensive tone here. You should not feel aggressed, people here are hard to convince and stronly opinionated, it is healthy. In this case your change is of no interest for the original st because the plateforms it targets have the ability to launch the same application multiple times, that's all. -- q
