* Jason Woofenden <[email protected]> [2015-04-23 14:36]: > Both implementations (before and after your patch) pass a char*. > But (assuming I'm reading the code correctly) they don't pass the > same address.
True, the old one assumes a char** (an array of strings), whereas the new one assumes a char*, i.e., string. As evascript() later only accepts one char*, it doesn't make sense to put it behind an other layer of indirection into the arg->v. Cheers Jochen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
