I am using `torify surf` in arm architecture, there doesn't seems to
have any problems. I am using `torsocks` version 2.1.0 and the git
`surf`.

I just have some problems with the memory, there seems to have some
memory leak, using a window of surf for about half an hour might use
more memory compare to using a firefox with a lot of tabs.

I does not know how to use `valgrind` and `strace` to trace the memory
leaks. Does someone know how to trace the memory leaks?

Is there a way that surf could use something like this to lower the
memory:

 master
 ├─ worker
 ├─ worker
 ├─ worker
 └─ worker

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:00:40PM +0200, Gabriel Pérez-Cerezo wrote:
Hello,

I run surf  through tor using 'torify  surf'. If I don't  add the '-i'
option, it segfaults  when searching on Duckduckgo. Even if  I add the
'-i' flag, it crashes after some time with messages like
"*** Error in `surf': free(): invalid pointer: 0x095ca248 ***"
or a  segmentation fault  and often  reaches 100%  CPU usage.  Can you
replicate this situation?

The command prints
[Aug  18  11:55:55]  WARNING  torsocks[14305]:  [syscall]  Unsupported
syscall number 240.  Denying the call (in tsocks_syscall() at syscall.c:165)
to STDOUT.

The output of uname -a is Linux gilbert 3.16.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian
3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u3 (2015-08-04)  i686 GNU/Linux  on my  system, I'm
running  the  latest (git)  version  of  surf with  the  searchengines
patch.

Best,

Gabriel Pérez-Cerezo

--
Gabriel Pérez-Cerezo Flohr .------------------------------------------
GPG Key: BB09BA34D353EC69 / Email is like a postcard, anyone can read
Website: http://gpcf.eu  / it. Please use the GPG Key to encrypt your
Email: gabr...@gpcf.eu  / emails (tutorial: emailselfdefense.fsf.org).


--
_____________________________________
< Do what you like, like what you do. >
-------------------------------------
       \   ^__^
        \  (oo)\_______
           (__)\       )\/\
               ||----w |
               ||     ||

Reply via email to