On 28 February 2016 at 17:20, Greg Reagle <greg.rea...@umbc.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:34:37AM +0000, Raphaël Proust wrote:
>> I managed to reconstruct an example that I am dissatisfied about.
>> The following works:
>> Edit ,x/test/{
>> i/<
>> a/>
>> }
>> But not the following:
>> Edit ,x/test/{
>> a/>
>> i/<
>> }
>> The second one you the result "<tes>t" and a warning about changes
>> being out of sequence.
>
> I get these results: The first version works fine. The second version
> shows error "?changes not in sequence" and does nothing.
There is a difference between acme's handling. It prints a warning but
also does some changes which are mangled.
>
> But I don't see a big problem here, only a minor inconvenience. Do your
> insert before your append when using a braced compound command, and it
> works fine.
Yes, it's a minor inconvenience only.
