On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Martin Kühne <[email protected]> wrote: > Can it somehow be made to keep its effect across the exec family of syscalls? >
Having done my own research, no it can't. Also, the way it is designed is a rather silly approach to security which is much more revealing about today's idiotic way of writing software by including tens of millions of SLOC of dependencies instead of doing the one thing for the one job. Doesn't the loader also have a say in what addresses are known to a process? I personally find the idea of polluting our source code for this appalling and suggest the wiki. cheers! mar77i
