On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Greg Reagle <greg.rea...@umbc.edu> wrote: > My two cents... > Granted that rc+mk are far superior to /bin/sh+GNU make, but if there > are already 3rd party (i.e. not from suckless) packages/programs that > depend on sh+gmake, you might as well just use them as is. Doing a > whole lot of rewriting work just for purity's sake doesn't accomplish > much. So rc+mk can be used for suckless projects and new code in Stali > and so forth, but don't try to do huge amount of work to rewrite.
There's a new make file for each package anyway (stali.mk), so it doesn't matter if it's written in make+sh or mk+rc the amount of work is the same.
