On 21 September 2016 at 16:45, Evan Gates <evan.ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:02 PM, FRIGN <d...@frign.de> wrote:
>> Of course, given there is only one implementation, it is highly
>> portable per-se, given the interpretation is equal everywhere and 9base
>> is quite easily portable.
> Sadly there are two implementations. This rc[0] claims to be a
> reimplementation for unix systems, but contains incompatible changes.
> Here is the list of problems from the man page:

There are two, but only the original one can be considered. Byron's rc
was supposed to work in a regular unix environment with GNU userland.
But especially its environment handling is completely different to the
original rc, which allows exporting fn's.


Reply via email to