On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 01:17:38PM +0000, Cág wrote: > Staven wrote: > > >or do you know a better compromise than webkit? > > Yeah, write our own web engine with blackjack and hookers, which is > mentioned on Project ideas page.
c++ software pulls also a c++ compiler and runtime in their dependencies, which are horrendous compared to a C compiler/miminal runtime. When you add up all of this, we are in no compromise but a total rip off and take over of those critical software components by very few corporations. Then I repeat myself, this is no compromise here, it's just being fuc*ed all the way. If I want to sabotage or take over a software component, I'll migrate it to c++ and push hard on a brain damaged object oriented design to scare away any reasonably skilled coders. Moreover that design will be so fuc*ed up, it will generate tons of bugs and security holes to justify a good salary for idiotic bosses (or as corrupted as their coders). The real pb are web coders: many of the web sites could have a noscript portal without losing significant functionalities. The web sites which _must_ have a rich GUI (hence a dynamic browser, for instance soundcloud) should provide an simple web API (without that pile of cra* which is OAuth). I'm about to sue some french administrations over their www sites and my french bank www sites for their lack of interop with light www browsers. -- Sylvain
