Stephen Turner wrote:
Toybox? I haven’t followed the project in a bit, I really should check in and see what they have finished but I know that project aimed to get most if not all of a build environment recreated in a portable form so if you haven’t seen it then I recommend it. If I may ask, why do you disapprove of make? I would like to see it redone but curious your reasons.
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. For core utilities I use sbase/ubase. Toybox doesn't have make(1). I do not disapprove of make. Ideally, I'd replace GNU make with a non-GPL non-GNU analog. -- caóc
