On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 1:24 PM Karl Bartel <kar...@gmail.com> wrote: > After reading the point "Improve the Markdown parser used by the > suckless wiki called "smu" to conform more to Markdown" on > https://suckless.org/project_ideas/ I fixed a few incompatibilities > that turned up when comparing smu against > https://github.com/michelf/mdtest. The results can be found at > https://github.com/karlb/smu. If anyone gives it a try, please let me > know about the results!
I've taken a quick look at the readme and I have a few questions / observations: * is the proposed markup compliant with CommonMark as implemented by https://github.com/commonmark/cmark ? (i.e. if so, which is the syntax that is common in both generators, `smu` and `cmark`?) * are code-blocks as separated by ```` on each line supported? (the issue with codeblocks as indented by spaces is that one can't easily copy-paste those in the shell or plain-text editor without removing the indentation;) * reading the readme as rendered by GitHub, it is misleading, especially regarding the quoting syntax; perhaps it would be better to put it as an plain `.txt` file which is much more readable; (I'm asking mainly from the perspective of using `smu` as a lightweight / simpler / clearer alternative to CommonMark in other projects.) Good work, Ciprian.
