On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 08:14:08AM +0200, Sagar Acharya wrote: > >I say that coming from one of the best universities in France; I didn't have > >very much respect left for the word "scientist" when I left > Same here. Exactly same! But they for sure are intelligent. One of the key > things in capitalism is getting tamed by the powerful. Majority of these > geniuses don't know how their work impacts the world! They get tamed by > people who work against their own principles just because knowing their > tamer's principles is difficult! > > >Now try bspwm > Damn that's good! Very simple logic. But I'll stick to dwm for now. Check it > after a while. > > >Where would you say their capacities are lacking? > Most don't have the logical abilities. Amongst ones who do, many don't want > to read in times of videos. They want instant gratification. For few it is > also about power. You suggest them to use dwm. They'll think they're above > you socially and won't use it. This maybe a bit biased but 1 thing I know for > sure, that people are far, very far away from using minimal systems. > > >The practical knowledge of computer science comes from experience in a > >consumer-driven, market environment. Academia is not that environment. > +1. > > >A lot of people had a take for a user-friendlier dwm, you should try those, > >or similar wms with "battery pack included" like i3 or awesome. > Again, I'm not talking about dwm specifically. i3wm is a single wm and while > it's good, I think suckless can target COMPLETE systems. It's philosophy is > great. > > >We believe this should become the mainstream philosophy in the IT sector. - > >On suckless site. > This IT sector is constantly making things easier for people or atleast > making people believe it is. If suckless wants this to become mainstream > philosophy, it has to do itself. People don't wanna change especially when > computers are just the tools to achieve some end. > > If suckless makes it easy for people to use minimalistic systems, they will. > I shifted from complete windows to dual boot to complete GNU/Linux (Parrot > Linux) to Parabola (Plasma) to Parabola (dwm) in about 3 years. I can't > imagine shifting directly to current state. I would get frustrated and go > back to Windows if someone would ask me to get to this point from complete > Windows. But if there were tutorials explaning why would you use wm instead > of de, wm were a bit more beautiful, things would be much simpler. Plasma is > hands down beautiful! But it's very complex! > > Thanking you > Sagar Acharya > https://designman.org >
> P.S. I'd love to contribute. > Whats stopping you from doing it? -- Kind regards, Hiltjo
