On Sat Apr 23, 2022 at 4:28 AM EDT, Chris Down wrote:
> Sebastian LaVine writes:
> >I believe this is known unintended behavior from the patch. I reverted it on
> >my personal branch.
>
> It looks like you reverted commit bece862a0fc4 ("manage: For
> isfloating/oldstate check/set, ensure trans client actually exists"), not
> this
> commit, right?[0]
Ah yep, sorry for the confusion. I had assumed that was the patch being
talked about and didn't double-check my memory. I was recalling this
message on the hackers list (which...I see you submitted, lol):
https://lists.suckless.org/hackers/2203/18220.html
> In which case that makes me even more confident that bece862a0fc4 ("manage:
> For
> isfloating/oldstate check/set, ensure trans client actually exists") is the
> cause, not 8806b6e23793 ("manage: propertynotify: Reduce cost of unused size
> hints").
>
> 0: https://git.sr.ht/~smlavine/dwm/commit/c6b8143
