Oh, I see ! You're from the “Common Law v Maritime Law,” “Free Man on
the Land” [1] bunch. I've enjoyed this conspiracy theory a lot, in
France we had the “je ne contracte pas” [2] stemming from it just last
year. But French law stems from Napoleonic Civil Code, i.e. continental
law, which is ; little to do with Common Law... Anyways.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeman_on_the_land_movement
[2] https://www.youtube.com/clip/UgkxWnBY9qjby4Uw71PwEZ3EvFhlKiWRqkB9
In the end, I believe this all stems from the misplaced free association
thought (or misplaced “right brain” more or less). As somebody else
says, “I stopped nurturing any interest in Ancap/Libertarianism when I
realized it is but yet another neuroatypy.”
Enjoy
On 2025-03-28 14:58, justina colmena ~biz wrote:
The shrinks got too litigious, and "mental health" is practiced as a
branch of "law" alongside "intellectual property" and other matters
that are either "imaginary" or "all in your head" ...
There are laws against "simulating legal process" over such imaginary
matters etc.
<https://law.justia.com/codes/alaska/title-11/chapter-56/article-4/section-11-56-620/>
but such laws are never enforced, because even without a Constitution
the law itself can't be illegal in a court of law, and even if it
were, the attorneys can't prosecute themselves or else they'd put
themselves out of business for their own practices.
The "law" itself by definition being whatever "lawyers" keep
themselves in business practicing and billing for. Unless you think
you can be successful in court as yet another crackpot mentally ill
"pro se" petitioner with a flat tire or another speeding ticket or
traffic violation on the way to court you must answer, with paying off
all your parking tickets and getting your vehicle released from city
hall impound after court, but your own petitions are just going to be
professionally dismissed for failure to appear at any one of those
numerous perfunctory court hearings for filing a suit. Cops have
grappling hooks and shoot-out axle nets to physically disable and stop
your vehicle on the road now. That's why the real pro lawyers always
hail a cab or take Uber or Lyft to court because you can't even
consider driving or parking your own vehicle in a hostile red-light
district.
On March 28, 2025 2:48:29 AM PDT, sylv...@saboua.me wrote:
On 2025-03-28 07:01, justina colmena ~biz wrote:
On Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:51:35 AM Pacific Daylight Time izzy
Meyer wrote:
Curious why you chose to invalidate this person's experience that
they
made themselves vulnerable about. Sure- you have your views on
things,
and that's totally cool. But maybe try being a bit more forgiving of
someone who, again, made themselves vulnerable next time?
People serve process with mental health allegations that sticks
worse than a
felony record in court for the rest of a person's life, and they
want others
to be forgiving of them?
Oh ! I think I get you. I had the impression that you were sympathetic
to
antipsychiatry, especially given the related posts on your blog. I'm
still
not very sure but ... I've never been charged for anything criminal or
against
the law, you're making quite a broad generalization here.
When talking about mental illness and the aforementioned soothing I
get from
obsd and suckless, I was alluding to the relative cognitive overload
undeliberately enforced by other projects which seems mostly absent
from these
two – as hinted at in the title of my page UNIX.html @saboua.xyz
Mental health services, like those of astrologers or magicians,
psychics,
tarot card readers, palmists, have gained far too much of a sheen of
legitimacy (or color of law, as it were) in court for service of
process and
summons to appear -- Say does a person really have an organic
"mental illness"
of known etiology? Or is it simply a case of simulated legal process
with a
catch-all diagnosis to make a person appear "formally mad" in a
court of law
for some other legal summons?
That's right. A lot of diagnoses are abusive, esp. when considering
the prevalent
traumatic liminal state that pervades among our relatives within
society. But as
for me I attribute this to Big Pharma's lucrative motive, not legal
summons which
I've seen cases of while at the ward.
Absolutely no morality is inherent in the "law" just because it's
the law.
Precisely. Legal is not necessarily moral.
Sylvain Saboua
--
Sylvain Saboua
