Semantic layer Extensions!? Sign me up! Left a comment, but I think this is all going in the correct direction for Superset’s future.
+1, binding. On Feb 4, 2026 at 11:42 AM -0800, [email protected], wrote: > Edited to add: > > > In this work, new semantic layers will be added as extensions, > > following the design from [SIP-151] The vision for a new Superset > > Plugins Architecture #31932. > > On 2026-02-04 06:46, Michael S. Molina wrote: > > Thanks for the SIP Beto. I left a comment in the SIP during the > > discussion phase asking if it’s possible to update the description > > with the results of our discussion with the Extensions group. Could > > you address this comment? I will wait for the updated version to cast > > my vote. > > > > Best regards, > > Michael S. Molina > > > > > On 4 Feb 2026, at 07:32, Mehmet Salih Yavuz <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > **Mehmet Salih Yavuz** > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > > On Monday, 02/02/26 at 20:33 [email protected] wrote: > > > Hi, folks! > > > > > > I'd like to call for a vote on SIP-182, "Semantic Layer Support in > > > Apache Superset": > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/35003 > > > > > > Semantic layers will be implemented as extensions, as agreed on the > > > discussion about the SIP. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > --Beto > > >
