Also ...
On Sep 1, 2006, at 8:44 AM, Jakob Lechner wrote:
8. For a more detailed description of the mentioned interface and the
architecture of the smarttag classes have a look at our UML diagram
in the attachments.
Seems they got stripped. And ...
The smarttag implementation consists of three parts:
[...]
2. Xml smarttag classes that process xml files, provide the
recognize function and execute the defined actions.
For example, on this, we're not yet settled on a specific proposal, but
what I am advocating is that we provide an extensible metadata system
like Adobe's XMP. So there would be a common model for metadata with
some bundled properties. Users and developers could then extend it.
The advantage that this has for these sorts of solutions is that we can
think of a generic metadata API and a serialization that works across
ODF applications, without need for any particular processing logic.
The programming becomes simpler, and the files are more portable.
I think this has clear advantages over an MS-like approach.
Bruce
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
