I agree 3 character extension is always better than any other extensions :-)
But I found XAR to be a little common extension for example it is being used by MS-Excel as Excel AutoRecover File<http://www.microsoft.com/office/excel/>and there are some other media types which refers with the XAR extension. How about SXR which is not associated with any of the files to my knowledge. Thanks, Ruwan On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Andreas Veithen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > With the improvements I proposed in SYNAPSE-377 it will become possible to > deploy (including hot deployment) Synapse extensions, i.e. mediators and > startups, not only in the form of simple JAR files, but also in the form of > archive files with embedded JARs, meaning that the extension can be bundled > and deployed together with its dependencies. This is similar to how AAR > files for Axis2 services and MAR files for Axis2 modules work. To > distinguish this kind of archives from normal JARs, it will be necessary to > chose a new file extension. Initially I proposed SXAR for Synapse eXtension > ARchive, but after giving it some thought, I believe that XAR sounds better. > I would like to have the opinion of the developer and user community on > this. Any comments and suggestions are welcome! > > Regards, > > Andreas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Ruwan Linton http://wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com/
