Eric Excellent point about load-balanced/failover endpoints. +1.
I think it would be very good to be able to set transport properties on an endpoint level. How about having some specific transport specific configuration elements: e.g. <http version="1.0|1.1" chunked="true|false"> <proxy....> <accept....> </http> <jms....> We could build some extension model which allows settings for arbitrary transports to be added in a way that is natural for that transport, so we could later add <smtp> or <fix>. Paul On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Hubert, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > sounds like an interersting idea. We actually define it in exactly that way > on an endpoint level in our custom "repository" and generate a synapse.xml > containing the property mediator to set this property. It would be more > straightforward to be able to set this at the endpoint level. There one > should consider LoadbalanceEndpoints as a kind of container from which > "child endpoints" should inherit the defaults. Right now some properties > need to be specified at the individual endpoint level like suspend duration > and timeout. Most of the time all endpoints of a loadbalancing group should > be handled in the same way (either all http 1.0 or all http 1.1 etc.) Just a > thought… > > > > Regards, > > Eric > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Asankha C. Perera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 1:08 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Making force HTTP 1.0 a part of the endpoint definition? > > > > Paul > > Infact I was thinking of the same thing.. and was suggesting to Ruwan about > allowing properties to be set at an Endpoint level.. and the most useful > properties could be for HTTP 1.0. use of just the PATH instead of full URL, > setting JMS reply destinations etc.. > > asankha > > Paul Fremantle wrote: > > I'm generally against hard-coding transport specifics, but the high > > number of people running into trouble with HTTP1.0-only servers makes > > me wonder if its worth us adding a flag to the endpoint definition to > > force HTTP 1.0? > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > -- > Asankha C. Perera > > WSO2 - http://wso2.org > http://esbmagic.blogspot.com -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2 Apache Synapse PMC Chair OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
