I'm not in favor of renaming the transport package. The reason is that the transports depend on Axis2 and that Axis2 depends on the transports (you can't ship an Axis2 release without transports). Therefore both projects have more in common than just "org.apache".
Andreas On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 16:21, Ruwan Linton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for the release plan... > > I think we should rename the transport package names, it is now out of both > axis2 and synapse and we should treat it as a new commons project. > > I propose org.apache.ws.transport as the base package name. > > WDYT? > > Thanks, > Ruwan > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Asankha Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Deepal jayasinghe wrote: >> >> Hi all >> >> This is to let you know that I hope to work on getting Synapse 1.3 out >> soon.. I also think we should cut the branch when we are quite close >> to the release, to ensure that the merging back [if any] will be >> minimal.. Thus here is my plan of action proposed.. >> >> >> +1 >> How about releasing transport module and then make Synapse depend on >> that ? is it doable ? >> >> Problem is the package name conflict! Having the same transport classes in >> axis2 kernel and transports :-( >> >> asankha >> >> -- >> Asankha C. Perera >> http://adroitlogic.org >> >> http://esbmagic.blogspot.com > > > > -- > Ruwan Linton > http://wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform" > http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
