Tried increasing timeout and no luck, never gets to Synapse (with this 
install). Just to doublecheck where did you suggest increasing this value ?
What file ?

In a different machine (another install) it runs but never returns from Axis 
Server. Same JVM; same Path etc...

Seems this trunk is still too flaky on Windows ?
On both machines works with release 1.2 but we can't use that :-)

So I give up; wasted too much time on Sample 400. It should just work. To me 
cousld be another transport bug in Synapse on Windows so no longer have time to 
pursue.

Do you know if the SSL proxy is going to be fixed in 1.3; otherwise we may need 
to evaluate another ESB; 

Kim




-----Original Message-----
From: Asankha Perera on behalf of Asankha C. Perera
Sent: Tue 31/03/2009 14:55
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Synapse sample 400: Splitting and aggregrating messages - Client 
times out when running the sample
 
Kim
> Seems like this issues has come back or is a Windows NT thing. Was Jira
> (SYNAPSE-270) but was closed.
> Same error mesage now with Trunk 525 and also with Trunk of 16 March;
> running
> with jdk1.5.0_17 on Windows NT.
>
> Client dump:
>
> url[http://localhost:8280/services/SplitAggregateProxy]
>      [java] java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
>   
Are you seeing any errors on the Synapse side? If not, this could be a 
harmless client timeout which sometimes is natural, if Synapse took 
longer than the SO_TIMEOUT of the client to reply back. Can you check 
the Synapse logs, and if nothing is reported, you could increase the 
client side socket timeout

cheers
asankha

-- 
Asankha C. Perera
AdroitLogic, http://adroitlogic.org

http://esbmagic.blogspot.com





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


<<winmail.dat>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to