I've attached a patch. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-553
Thanksn Supun.. On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Veithen <[email protected] > wrote: > I think the best solution is simply to extend the meaning of the > <detail> configuration element so that it can contain any XML content. > > Andreas > > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 07:56, Supun Kamburugamuva <[email protected]> > wrote: > > There are many ways of specifying details in the fault mediator. At the > > moment we specify expresion as an attribute, and detail text as text of > the > > detail element. If we introduce the capability to include an element, we > > have three types of values for detail element. > > Expression > > Text > > Element > > > > Since expression is specified as an attribute we don't have a problem > > recognizing it. > > > > But both Text and Element will be specified as a child of Detail. We can > > distinguise this programmatically. But we have the option of introducing > a > > method for distinguising text and element syntactically. i.e. introducing > an > > optional attribute. > > > > I would like to know what the community prefers. > > > > Thanks, > > Supun.. > > > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Supun Kamburugamuva <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Yes, I would like to provide a patch and I'm working on it. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Supun > >> > >> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Ruwan Linton <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Yes this is a short come of the fault mediator, would you like to > provide > >>> a patch for this? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Ruwan > >>> > >>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Supun Kamburugamuva < > [email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Sorry, small correction in the previous mail: I want to specify an > >>>> element as the fault detail not a SOAP element. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Supun.. > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Supun Kamburugamuva < > [email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> I want to specify a SOAP element as the fault detail using the > >>>>> MakeFaultMediator. It seems it is not possible with the current > >>>>> implementation. I'm I missing something or is it not possible? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thnaks > >>>>> Supun.. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc > >>>>> http://wso2.org > >>>>> supunk.blogspot.com > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc > >>>> http://wso2.org > >>>> supunk.blogspot.com > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Ruwan Linton > >>> Senior Software Engineer & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; > http://wso2.org/esb > >>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org > >>> email: [email protected]; cell: +94 77 341 3097 > >>> blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc > >> http://wso2.org > >> supunk.blogspot.com > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc > > http://wso2.org > > supunk.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc http://wso2.org supunk.blogspot.com
