Glen,

Hhhmmm, that's logical and I didn't knew this convention.

+1 for 1.4.0-SNAPSHOT as the trunk version, which can be modified as
appropriate after branching out for the next release.

Thanks,
Ruwan

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Glen Daniels <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think one popular pattern (the one the release plugin supports by
> default,
> for instance) is for the trunk to reflect the next version expected to be
> released *from the trunk*.  So after 1.3, for instance, the trunk might
> change to "1.4-SNAPSHOT", where further 1.3 development (including point
> releases like 1.3.1) would continue on the 1.3 branch.
>
> Thoughts on that?
>
> --Glen
>
> Ruwan Linton wrote:
> > Fine with me... but that sounds like a branch version but not really the
> > trunk version.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruwan
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Andreas Veithen
> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Why not 1.3.1-SNAPSHOT??
> >
> >     Andreas
> >
> >     On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 18:00, Ruwan Linton<[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >     > Done!
> >     >
> >     > BTW: What do you guys think about the trunk version scheme that I
> >     proposed
> >     > (0.0.0-SNAPSHOT)
> >     >
> >     > Thanks,
> >     > Ruwan
> >     >
> >     > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Ruwan Linton
> >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >     > wrote:
> >     >>
> >     >> Andreas/Glen,
> >     >>
> >     >> Yeah, I just tested it and it seems like the maven bundle plugin
> >     takes
> >     >> care of the conversion from '-' to '.'
> >     >>
> >     >> Will change the version as appropriate.
> >     >>
> >     >> Thanks,
> >     >> Ruwan
> >     >>
> >     >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Ruwan Linton
> >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >     >> wrote:
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Glen Daniels
> >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >     >>> wrote:
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> Hi Ruwan:
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
> >     >>>> > --- synapse/branches/1.3/modules/commons/pom.xml (original)
> >     >>>> > +++ synapse/branches/1.3/modules/commons/pom.xml Thu Jul 30
> >     15:00:45
> >     >>>> > 2009
> >     >>>> > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> >     >>>> >      <parent>
> >     >>>> >          <groupId>org.apache.synapse</groupId>
> >     >>>> >          <artifactId>Apache-Synapse</artifactId>
> >     >>>> > -        <version>SNAPSHOT</version>
> >     >>>> > +        <version>1.3.0.SNAPSHOT</version>
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> Isn't the canonical Maven pattern 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT (i.e.
> >     "SNAPSHOT" as the
> >     >>>> version qualifier)? [1]
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Glen, the issue is that OSGi containers expect the bundle
> >     version scheme
> >     >>> to be major.minor.micro.qualifier where as if we put in the '-'
> >     to separate
> >     >>> the qualifier we will need to have a different value as the
> >     bundle version
> >     >>> (which is going to go into the MANIFEST).
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Managing the versions this way will make it consistent with the
> OSGi
> >     >>> versioning scheme, while it is OK with maven.
> >     >>>
> >     >>> Thanks,
> >     >>> Ruwan
> >     >>>
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> --Glen
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>> [1]
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>>
> >
> http://www.sonatype.com/books/maven-book/reference/pom-relationships-sect-pom-syntax.html
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>>
> >     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     >>>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>>
> >     >>> --
> >     >>> Ruwan Linton
> >     >>> Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb
> >     >>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org
> >     >>> email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; cell: +94 77 341
> 3097
> >     >>> blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >> --
> >     >> Ruwan Linton
> >     >> Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb
> >     >> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org
> >     >> email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; cell: +94 77 341
> 3097
> >     >> blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > --
> >     > Ruwan Linton
> >     > Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb
> >     > WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org
> >     > email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; cell: +94 77 341
> 3097
> >     > blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com
> >     >
> >
> >     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ruwan Linton
> > Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb
> > WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org
> > email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; cell: +94 77 341 3097
> > blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Ruwan Linton
Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org
email: [email protected]; cell: +94 77 341 3097
blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com

Reply via email to