On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Hiranya Jayathilaka > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Rajika, >> >> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I'd like to hear your feedback before I provide you with a patch for the >>> issue[1]. First it's an important improvement to vfs-transport. >>> I think we can fix the problem by introducing an optional parameter for >>> the vfs transport , "transport.vfs.TempFileName". >> >> >> Why does the user has to specify this? >> > No, it should be an indicator ( a boolean) which suggest to use a temp file > or not. > Why? Writing to a temp file and then moving the file to the appropriate place is the safest approach for handling file uploads. Thanks, Hiranya > > Rajika > > >> I think this behavior should be there by default in the transport. The >> transport should figure out suitable names for temp files. Also I don't >> think we can use a single name for all temp files. There could be situations >> where multiple worker threads are trying to upload several files to the same >> server. >> >> Thanks, >> Hiranya >> >> >>> If a user has provided this parameter we'll use this file on the remote >>> server to upload the file. Once the upload is completed we will move the >>> temporary file to the original file(which will delete the temp file). >>> Comments? Suggestions? >>> >>> Rajika >>> >>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-502 >>> >>> -- >>> http://rajikak.blogspot.com/ >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Hiranya Jayathilaka >> Software Engineer; >> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org >> E-mail: [email protected]; Mobile: +94 77 633 3491 >> Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com >> > > > > -- > http://rajikak.blogspot.com/ > -- Hiranya Jayathilaka Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org E-mail: [email protected]; Mobile: +94 77 633 3491 Blog: http://techfeast-hiranya.blogspot.com
