[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12865530#action_12865530
]
Ruwan Linton commented on SYNAPSE-593:
--------------------------------------
Supun,
This patch violates the proxy service semantics, and introduces a bit of
complexity into the configuration.
When a user creates a proxy the user expects the message to be mediated via
inSeqeuence and the response to be mediated via the outSequence. If there is a
receiving sequence specified in the send mediator in the inSequence the
functionality violates the above semantic.
I am OK with the idea of receiving sequence in general, but -1 for applying
this patch. We need to work on this a bit more to get this right so that it
doesn't conflict the original concepts of synapse.
I will try to modify the implementation when I get some free time, or can you
propose any changes to make sure there are no conflicts in the semantics.
Thanks,
Ruwan
> Specifying a receiving sequence for sent messages
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SYNAPSE-593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-593
> Project: Synapse
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Supun Kamburugamuva
> Assignee: Supun Kamburugamuva
> Attachments: synapse_service_chaining.patch
>
>
> If a receiving sequence is specified for send mediator, the response can be
> directed to this sequence. This way we can achieve service chaining with
> normal non-blocking transport calls.
> I'm attaching a patch that introduce this feature. Please have a look and
> provide your feed back.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
