Hi Indika, On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:03 PM, indika kumara <[email protected]>wrote:
> Udayanga, +1 for the approach. > > However, I have several concerns > > Could this and the endpoint template proposed by Supun be similar? > Personally, I believe it would be better to reduce language constructs > defined by the language. As the synapse language supposed to be a DSL, I > think making it simple, domain specific, and intutive would be important. > > it has similar intent..but implementations might be different...IMO what supun has suggested is a static configuration for endpoints without any parametrization. > Supun used 'endpoint-template' and in your configuration it is 'template' > (is this a sequence-template?). > > yes it is more on the lines of a sequence-template > We may be able to use 'template' for Both or at least the same way of doing > - conceptual integrity. > true. But since they contain some amount of orthogonality , I think best option is to implement these different cases first and see the possibility of connecting them later :) Regards, Udayanga-- *Udayanga Wickramasinghe* Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com, *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 (77) 983-4365 blog: **http://udayangawiki.blogspot.com*<http://udayangawiki.blogspot.com/> * twitter: **http://twitter.com/udayanga_wick*<http://twitter.com/udayanga_wick> * *
