hi,

Current SynapseXPath   operates on top of the axiom objects. So  we have to
consume whole axiom object for xpath evalution.
In this case it is not needed to consume whole OMElement it evaluates xpath
from the events coming from XMLStreamReader
and do not buffer events. in the Axiom level it  buffers events so in
content based routing  when large number of events coming performance can
be reduced due to event buffering so this should increase performance in
content based routing.

thanks
isuru



On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Hiranya Jayathilaka (JIRA) <[email protected]
> wrote:

>
>     [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13727943#comment-13727943]
>
> Hiranya Jayathilaka commented on SYNAPSE-955:
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Hi Isuru,
>
> What is the advantage of this, over what we already have?
>
> > XPath1.0 Implementation On Top Of XMLStream
> > -------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: SYNAPSE-955
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-955
> >             Project: Synapse
> >          Issue Type: Improvement
> >          Components: Core
> >    Affects Versions: FUTURE
> >            Reporter: isuru janith ranawaka
> >            Assignee: Hiranya Jayathilaka
> >            Priority: Minor
> >              Labels: 2013, gsoc
> >
> > Current SynapseXPath is operates on top of the Axiom Object Model and
> this project is for evaluate XPath On top of the XMLStream. XMLStreamReader
> is given as input and the resulting output is given as OMElements.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> administrators
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to