Do we have shell access to the build servers to see if some service is using 61616?
I had a look at the integration tests and the base classes seem to be handling cleanup of ActiveMQ just fine. This code is also untouched for a while. Since we are not seeing any issues in a local build, shall we use a non standard ActiveMQ port in integration tests? On 3 October 2016 at 06:29, Isuru Udana <isud...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sample 250 and 251 integration tests are failing in jenkins. I can build > locally without an issue. > > This is due to a port binding issue for ActiveMQ in jenkins server. > > > > Sample 250: JMS to HTTP > ======================= > 2016-10-02 17:41:39,989 [-] [main] ERROR ActiveMQController There was an > error starting JMS broker: 0 > java.io.IOException: Failed to bind to server socket: tcp://localhost:61616 > due to: java.net.BindException: Address already in use > at > org.apache.activemq.util.IOExceptionSupport.create(IOExceptionSupport.java:33) > > ........ > > > ........ > > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74) > Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 11:20 PM, Apache Jenkins Server < > jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > >> See <https://builds.apache.org/job/Synapse%20-%20Trunk/changes> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@synapse.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@synapse.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > *Isuru Udana* > Technical Lead > > > > > *; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com <http://wso2.com>email: isud...@gmail.com > <isud...@gmail.com> blog: http://mytecheye.blogspot.com/ > <http://mytecheye.blogspot.com/>* > > > >
