Hi all,
any news about this?

I've seen that SYNCOPE-239 was created.

Regards.

On 21/11/2012 13:28, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 21/11/2012 13:24, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Both I would say ;)
Both for client POM, anything else on trunk-only: we agreed on removing
any OSGi-related modification due to SYNCOPE-203, right?

Regards.

On 11/21/2012 01:19 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 21/11/2012 13:17, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi Colm,

if you don't mind, I can do it.
I have some new stuff to add around OSGi.
Into branch 1_0_X (as per Colm's request) or trunk?

Regards.

By the way, no objection on my side ;)

Regards
JB

On 11/21/2012 01:14 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi guys,

Are there any objections if I backport the (OSGi) changes to
client/pom.xml
that JB made to the 1_0_X branch? That would enable me to use
Syncope's
REST API in a third party application deployed to an OSGi container.
Core/Console would be unaffected.

Colm.

--
Francesco Chicchiriccò

ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/

Reply via email to