> When using the CSVDir 0.7-SNAPSHOT we would be forced to use ConnId > 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.3.2. >
Is there any reason why we can't just do that on trunk anyway? I assume we're going to release Syncope 1.1 with ConnId 1.3.3 anyway? > Why not backporting your fix on 0.7-SNAPSHOT to 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT? > I will do. Colm. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò < ilgro...@apache.org> wrote: > On 19/02/2013 11:13, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Following the query on the CSV SNAPSHOT in Syncope, just wondering why are >> we including 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT on trunk instead of 0.7-SNAPSHOT? The former >> does not include the fixes I made recently (in particular the properties >> file is in the wrong package name, and so the correct property keys are >> not >> displayed in Syncope). >> > > When using the CSVDir 0.7-SNAPSHOT we would be forced to use ConnId > 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.3.2. > > Why not backporting your fix on 0.7-SNAPSHOT to 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT? > > Regards. > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member > http://people.apache.org/~**ilgrosso/<http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/> > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
