Il giorno 20/feb/2013, alle ore 13.28, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto:
>> think that we can move Syncope 1.1.0 to ConnId 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT, thus avoid
>> branching.
>>
>
> Any objections to me moving the Syncope trunk pom to use 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT,
> and the SNAPSHOT versions of the Connector bundles?
+1
>
> Colm.
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh
> <cohei...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>>
>> Given the retro-compatibility feature reported above, if confirmed
>>> working, I think that we can move Syncope 1.1.0 to ConnId 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT,
>>> thus avoid branching.
>>>
>>> Sorry for not having made this re-thinking clear.
>>
>>
>> Ah, ok got it, thanks.
>>
>> Colm.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
>> ilgro...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/02/2013 13:04, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Francesco,
>>>>
>>>> I thought we could avoid this branching if we are able to verify that
>>>>> you can use "old" (e.g. compiled against ConnId 1.3.2) connectors with
>>>>> "new"
>>>>> (e.g. 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT) framework,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I guess I misunderstood. I understand that we want to run an "old"
>>>> connector with the new framework, and so for example the CSV 0.6.x branch
>>>> should be able to run against the 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT framework version.
>>>>
>>>> I don't understand though how we can avoid branching DB + LDAP if we want
>>>> to have the fixes I mentioned available in Syncope 1.1?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Given the retro-compatibility feature reported above, if confirmed
>>> working, I think that we can move Syncope 1.1.0 to ConnId 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT,
>>> thus avoid branching.
>>>
>>> Sorry for not having made this re-thinking clear.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
>>>> ilgro...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 19/02/2013 12:51, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> How about a new branch for the LDAP + DB bundles that I can backport
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> fixes to?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In terms of the DB Connector first, trunk is at 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT. How
>>>>>> about
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> update trunk to 2.2-SNAPSHOT + create a new branch called "2.1.X" (with
>>>>>> version 2.1.5-SNAPSHOT) before the recent revisions were made? I will
>>>>>> then
>>>>>> selectively merge various fixes. Any objections to this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought we could avoid this branching if we are able to verify that
>>>>> you
>>>>> can use "old" (e.g. compiled against ConnId 1.3.2) connectors with "new"
>>>>> (e.g. 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT) framework,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am I wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Fabio Martelli
>>>>>
>>>>>> <fabio.marte...@gmail.com>****wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Il giorno 19/feb/2013, alle ore 11.44, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha
>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Guys, I'd prefere to keep the 1.3.2 for Syncope 1.1.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since we are expecting to release soon I'd like to be sure about the
>>>>>>>>> reliability of the 1.1.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why do you think 1.3.3 would be particularly unreliable? There
>>>>>>>> have not
>>>>>>>> been many fixes made from what I can see.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't have strong objections to using 1.3.2 for Syncope 1.1,
>>>>>>>> however I
>>>>>>>> would like if the fixes I've made make it into Syncope for 1.1. I
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> backport the CSV fixes to the branch. How about a new branch for the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LDAP +
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DB bundles that I can backport fixes to? In particular I would like
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LDAP-2, LDAP-5 and LDAP-6 available in Syncope 1.1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK Colm, probably we can do the following.
>>>>>>> Since I'd like to maintain the possibility to switch from a newest
>>>>>>> connector version to an old one I'd ask you to verify before the
>>>>>>> possibility to run, for example, CsvDir 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT with the
>>>>>>> latest
>>>>>>> framework version.
>>>>>>> If I well remember this should be possible (the opposite is not
>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>> for sure). This would be sufficient to have my +1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> F.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Fabio Martelli
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <fabio.marte...@gmail.com>****wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Il giorno 19/feb/2013, alle ore 11.28, Colm O hEigeartaigh ha
>>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When using the CSVDir 0.7-SNAPSHOT we would be forced to use
>>>>>>>>> ConnId
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.3.2.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any reason why we can't just do that on trunk anyway? I
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> assume
>>>>>>>>>> we're going to release Syncope 1.1 with ConnId 1.3.3 anyway?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Guys, I'd prefere to keep the 1.3.2 for Syncope 1.1.0.
>>>>>>>>> Since we are expecting to release soon I'd like to be sure about the
>>>>>>>>> reliability of the 1.1.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> F.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why not backporting your fix on 0.7-SNAPSHOT to 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I will do.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Colm.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò <
>>>>>>>>>> ilgro...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 19/02/2013 11:13, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Following the query on the CSV SNAPSHOT in Syncope, just
>>>>>>>>>>>> wondering
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> why
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> we including 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT on trunk instead of 0.7-SNAPSHOT? The
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> former
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> does not include the fixes I made recently (in particular the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> properties
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> file is in the wrong package name, and so the correct property keys
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> displayed in Syncope).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When using the CSVDir 0.7-SNAPSHOT we would be forced to use
>>>>>>>>>>>> ConnId
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1.3.3-SNAPSHOT instead of 1.3.2.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why not backporting your fix on 0.7-SNAPSHOT to 0.6.1-SNAPSHOT?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> --
>>> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>>
>>> ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
>>> http://people.apache.org/~**ilgrosso/<http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "connid-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to
>>> connid-dev+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<connid-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>> .
>>> Visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/**group/connid-dev?hl=en-US<http://groups.google.com/group/connid-dev?hl=en-US>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>>
>> Talend Community Coder
>> http://coders.talend.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Colm O hEigeartaigh
>
> Talend Community Coder
> http://coders.talend.com
